The Irreverent and Progressive Midwesterner George Norris

24 Jul

PhD student Paul Putz, a Nebraskan, offers a nice post about a mostly-forgotten U.S. Senator from Nebraska: George Norris. Norris gained fame during his lifetime as an insurgent Republican during the Progressive Era (1900-1920). As Putz notes,

For an earlier generation of liberals, Norris was a saintly figure. His stubborn opposition to “monied interests,” his belief that the government could be a positive force for good in people’s lives, his reputation for integrity, and the fact that he remained a steadfast progressive throughout progressivism’s 1920s nadir captured the imagination of idealistic young Americans. In the 1950s, a panel of scholars put together by the U.S. Senate to determine the five most outstanding senators in American history voted Norris number one. In 1957, “John F. Kennedy” “wrote” Profiles in Courage, featuring Norris as one of his Courageous Eight U.S. senators.

Norris’s greatest hits are indeed impressive. He opposed Joe Cannon, J. Edgar Hoover, American entry into World War I, the Espionage Act, and the poll tax (this did not come until the end of his career). He championed the TVA, Norris-LaGuardia Act, 20th Amendment, Rural Electrification Act, and Nebraska’s Unicameral. And perhaps most impressive of all, he used an eight-foot spider labeled “Wall Street” as a prop for a speech on the Senate floor.

Putz is a religious historian, and he notes that Norris, while raised to know the Bible well, rejected organized Christianity but “held the ‘lowly Nazarene’ in high esteem.”

Putz interacts with some of Norris’ “editings” of an old hymnbook. He concludes:

I can’t help but think that the altered songbook, irreverent as it may seem to some Christian believers, was at least as sacred to Norris as a pristine edition would have been to anyone who merely sang along solemnly to the words. And I can’t help but think that the book represents something more — one part of Norris’s lifelong process of forming a personal, difficult-to-classify (“none”-ish?) faith of his own, a faith in which “humanity was his God” and in which, sometimes at least, the old wine skins worked just fine for the new wine.

I am struck by how Norris exemplifies some populist themes in Midwestern politics and religion (themes that arguably seem to have waned in more recent decades). Putz’s entire post is available here, at Religion in American History: Religion in American History: Take a Stand for Peanuts: Thinking Out Loud About The Irreverent George Norris.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Exploring the Past

Reading, Thinking, and Blogging about History

Enough Light

"In faith there is enough light for those who want to believe and enough shadows to blind those who don't." - Blaise Pascal

Lenten Lamentations

Preparing to Participate in God's Mosaic Kingdom

The Text Message

Discoveries from processing and reference archivists on the job

john pavlovitz

Stuff That Needs To Be Said

Wirelesshogan: Reflections from the Hogan

"History is the record of our loves in all their magnificent and ignoble forms." Eugene McCarraher

The Way of Improvement Leads Home

"History is the record of our loves in all their magnificent and ignoble forms." Eugene McCarraher

the way of improvement leads home

reflections at the intersection of American history, religion, politics, and academic life

The Pietist Schoolman

The website and blog of historian Chris Gehrz

Native News Online

American Indian News

Reformed Journal: The Twelve

Reformed. Done Daily.


by Alex Scarfe

Thoughtful Conversation about the American West

Northwest History

"History is the record of our loves in all their magnificent and ignoble forms." Eugene McCarraher

%d bloggers like this: